RSSHave you seen this?
July 31, 2009 by David Fitzgerald
|
| Print
Filed under Physiotherapy Blog
|
This is an extract from Peak Performance
Don’t see a physio
until you’ve read this message |
There may be something missing from your physio’s basic training that could affect you…
The facts that every athlete needs to hear – get your free copy of Sports Injury Bulletin’s most controversial issue ever
Plus, a bundle of free bonus special reports for every reader
“SIB provides a level of understanding of an injury that doctors and physios, for whatever reason, do not provide”
- Michael O’Connor, Sports Injury Bulletin member, Canada
Dear Athlete,
A recent issue of Sports Injury Bulletin sparked controversy with an article stating that there is a crucial element missing from the physio profession’s basic training.
Today, I would like to invite Sports Performance Bulletin subscribers to judge for themselves by offering you exclusive access to this restricted circulation newsletter – absolutely free.
Miss out? It could cost you your career.
Hot off the press, each issue of Sports Injury Bulletin has a cover price of $16.50. But for a limited time only you can get a copy absolutely free. Click here to learn how to claim your copy now.
What’s all the fuss about?
Our contributor’s recent experience of completing a Level 2 Strength and Conditioning course provoked him into asking publicly a question that has bothered him privately for a long time.
How can a physio practise in the sports field without a sound knowledge of strength and conditioning training?
The article, written by Sean Fyfe, argues that physiotherapy and strength and conditioning go hand in hand.
It is an integral part of the physiotherapist’s role to plan long-term rehabilitation and maintenance programs for acute and chronic injuries.
When Fyfe does this part of his job he is constantly drawing upon his knowledge of strength and conditioning. He has gained this knowledge as a result of a vast amount of independent study, a post-graduate degree and his own experience as a tennis player.
But if a physio is not taught the fundamentals of strength and conditioning in their undergraduate physiotherapy studies – how many have this ‘crucial’ knowledge now? And what effect will it have on the rehabilitation of your injuries – from back pain to achilles tendinitis – if your physio isn’t ‘in the know’?
It must be emphasised that Fyfe is in no way claiming to be unique among physios in having such knowledge; the important point is that those who have acquired it have done so through mechanisms other than their physiotherapy training. And Fyfe would hazard a guess that a large proportion of physios practice without such knowledge.
“I certainly took comfort in the fact that the physios with whom I underwent my recent strength and conditioning course, share my sentiments exactly. And all of us were at a loss to explain how it was that we were never taught the fundamentals of strength and conditioning training in our undergraduate physiotherapy studies.“
Claim your free copy of SIB and Sean Fyfe will take you through some of the principles behind program design, and as always with Sports Injury Bulletin, illustrate his argument with case studies. PLUS, act now and also claim a bundle of bonus free reports on Core Muscle Training and Back Injury Treatment and Prevention, and much more…
The flip side
Perhaps Sean has it all wrong.
Physiotherapy is not sports training.
After initial rehab it is up to the athlete to move on to the next professional with a different skill set. Isn’t it?
What all physios should know but don’t
Strength and Conditioning training covers a broad range of skills – strength, power, speed and agility, endurance and flexibility training and recovery methods – the significance of each of which varies according to the athlete being trained and their sport.
A competent trainer needs to understand the purpose of different exercises, exercise technique, correct programming for different sports, phases of training and individual circumstances, and the detail of how, when and why to vary instructions on the performance of sets, repetitions, speed of repetitions and length of rest periods.
But should a physio be expected to have the competencies of a strength and conditioning coach?
| Join the Debate
It was with great interest that I read Sean Fyfe’s article in about physiotherapists’ lack of knowledge of strength and conditioning training. In South Africa we continually face the “challenge” between the physiotherapy and biokinetics (strength and conditioning) professions about who should be doing what. It’s a relief to hear of other physiotherapists sharing my sentiment on the topic. - From Leon Raath, S Africa Click here to claim your free issue now, or read on for more details |
Whose job is it anyway?
It can be argued – and no doubt many physiotherapists will be thinking this – that this kind of exercise program-setting is surely the job of a professional strength and conditioning coach.
This is a fair comment – up to a point. It is the job of a physiotherapist to prescribe exercises and they therefore need to know what kinds of exercises should be done at which rehab points.
That is only possible if you understand properly how the movement and load will affect the injured structures.
Secondly, if they don’t understand these principles, how can we advise our coaching colleagues (whose primary purpose is to train healthy bodies, not injured or recovering ones)?
Thirdly, how many of you, as athletes, can afford to track down and work with a strength and conditioning coach, especially once you’ve already paid for your physiotherapy treatment?
Three key elements
Sean Fyfe states that three elements of strength training – exercise technique, progressive overload and specificity – are critical to the competent practice of physiotherapy.
“One of the lecturers on my recent course tells of how, as a tutor, he routinely encounters sports physiotherapists, many with more than 10 years’ experience, who cannot teach the performance of a basic squat. If they can’t teach a squat, it is doubtful they could teach someone to deadlift. So how, for example, have they been teaching their patients with lumbar disc injuries to brace their low backs in neutral?”
To take the point further,
“if they can’t teach a double-leg squat, they surely can’t teach a single-leg squat, so how have these physiotherapists been rehabilitating someone with patellofemoral dysfunction?”
Fyfe wasn’t taught on his undergraduate course how to squat or how to deadlift correctly, which does seem to me a pretty incredible omission.
“Here’s something else that was barely touched on in my undergraduate studies. The overload principle is the underpinning principle of all training. Put simply, the body adapts in line with the demands placed on it. To achieve a positive training response and thus gain strength improvements, you must overload the relevant muscles. Too little effort and the client will fail to make strength gains. But too much overload at any point will cause injury, so it is necessary to prescribe a program of progressive overload, manipulating the weight, repetitions, sets, rest periods and speed of movement”
The other key principle common to effective training and physiotherapy is specificity, or SAID (specific adaptations to imposed demands). Again, put simply, the body adapts in a highly specific way to increased demands: the precise input will determine the precise adaptation.
Case Study – Sprinter vs Marathon Runner
To illustrate this, let’s look at how you might use a single-leg squat in the rehab of a sprinter versus a marathon runner, both recovering from patellar tendinitis. The aim of the single leg squat is
- to improve strength and activation through gluteus maximus and gluteus medius
- to improve quadriceps strength and activate vastus medialis (VMO)
- to maintain neutral spine under load, and
- to improve proprioception of the lower limb chain.
The exercise is functional for the sporting needs of both athletes, and will be working aspects of their lower limb chain that probably need improvement to prevent further tensile overload to the patellar tendon. But the 100m sprinter needs to do all of these things fast, with maximal contraction, for 10 to 11 seconds; while the marathon runner does them all sub-maximally and slower — for more than two hours.
It is therefore no good prescribing exactly the same dose of this exercise to both athletes. The sprinter will need:
- low repetitions
- greater load to achieve maximal contraction
- fast speed of movement, and
- longer rest periods.
And the marathon runner needs quite the opposite.
The teaching of correct technique and the principles of overload and SAID should be at the forefront of a physiotherapist’s mind whenever prescribing an exercise program. Indeed, they should underpin the setting of all rehabilitation programs.
| Join the Debate
I have worked for many years for a well known fitness training company as a tutor in personal training and sports massage therapy. I have also run my own fitness consultancy for more than 10 years and have always been amazed by the number of people I see who have felt let down by physiotherapists, whom they felt did very little for their money. It is not simply that they lack a sports conditioning background but any real knowledge of training and therefore rehab. I have now stopped referring clients to any physiotherapist as I feel that a good personal trainer and massage therapist can do a better job most of the time. This is a sign of how much this industry has really moved on in recent years and the physios are being left behind. - From Kevin Witham, UK |
Programming in practice
In your free copy of SIB 57 you’ll find an in depth case study which outlines how strength and conditioning knowledge needs to be woven into the way a physiotherapist treats musculoskeletal problems. In this particular case, Fyfe examines a lumbar spine stress fracture which developed in this 16-year-old male tennis player as a result of serving.
A detailed 18 week strength and conditioning rehabilitation programme is given, at no cost, to further illustrate Fyfe’s argument.
Join in the debate: tell us your reactions to Sean Fyfe’s argument, your own views, experiences and proposals. Claim your free copy of Sports Injury Bulletin now
| Join the Debate
I have a number of years in private practice as a physio, prior to which I competed at national level, was a physical training instructor in the Army and a rugby coach. I can see both sides of the equation. The fundamental problem lies in the training of physiotherapists and what they are initially being trained for. In the UK their role is to work in the national health service, so most of the training is directed towards this. Nevertheless, I do remember spending at least three months during my course on exercise regimes, class training, circuit training and so on. When a physio wants to work in sport, it then becomes their own responsibility to undergo any additional qualifications. Sean Fyfe mentions physios not being able to demonstrate or teach a correct squat. I have seen the same problem among strength and conditioning coaches. Worse, I have seen coaches blame the individual for not being able to achieve correct technique without knowing why. The physio, on the other hand, is able to work out why someone can’t do a correct squat or dead lift, as they have a higher level of physiology, biomechanics and understanding of body position. They are also able to assess muscle control and joint function. From Mark Saunders, UK Click here to claim your free copy – and join the debate – now. |
